this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
1428 points (98.4% liked)
Facepalm
3130 readers
111 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're conflicting state and nation I think. Both are also pretty loose terms. Nations didn't really exist before nationalism in the 1800s and states are just big ships of thesiii
I was thinking more along the lines of governmental continuity, which has just as arbitrary lines. But less arbitrary in some cases like conquest or dynastic change. Like there was something that happened between Julius Caesar and Agustus. The line isn't super clear, but the Republican government and the empire definitely have some key differences even if the Senate was never really disolved.
But I remember Louis XIV saying something like "I die, but the state remains". So I think in some proto form "the state" or something larger than just the ruler has existed on and off throughout history.