this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
880 points (94.7% liked)

196

5125 readers
1644 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
880
Boeing rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

And their planes made with scrap parts are still flying around.

Edit: A lot of new .world users showing up with ChatGPT responses about how this was a conspiracy, reminds me of an article i read this week.

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/657978/reddit-ai-experiment-banned

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Chat,

Did the Boeing whistleblower who deliberately told his family and friends that he wasn't suicidal commit suicide?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Suicidal people lie about being suicidal.

That's like the first thing you learn Suicide Awareness.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Do suicidal people reach out to their freinds and family to specifically tell them they aren't going to commit suicide and nothing else?

You're not going to be able to push your narrative here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Suicidal people lie about being suicidal. And yes, they do reach out to friends and family.

It's also important to note here, John Barnett was not giving any sort of testimony that could harm Boeing. That's not what the trial was over,

No, the trial, or rather the appeal, was over Boeing's retaliation against John Barnett for his past whistleblowing. Whistleblowing that resulted in Boeing receiving a fine.

That particular case was done and over. John Barnett had nothing more to add.

John Barnett sued Boeing for the wrongful termination, and other retaliation including Blackballing him (talking to other Aerospace companies to make sure they wouldn't hire him), John lost the court case to Boeing's high priced lawyers.

John then appealed, and gave testimony in court in front of the appeals judge.

I don't know if you've ever been at a low point like that. Where you think you've hit rock bottom, and you hinge your hopes on just one thing going right, only for it to go horribly wrong.

I've been to that false rock bottom, and found the depths hidden below it.

Boeing didn't need to hire some contract killer to pull the trigger.

John Barnett was fighting his wrongful termination for seven years. That's how Boeing got John to pull the trigger. They drove him to suicide, didn't need to go any further.

That's what you conspiracy nuts miss. Boeing ruined a man's life, and that's the part that you're ignoring. Or maybe you heard someone rightfully say that Boeing killed a man, and you thought it was meant literally.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/business/boeing-john-barnett-lawsuit.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Dk8.yNQ6.TlGz67jKE6MN

His own family filed a lawsuit against Boeing that they were responsible for his death by causing his anxiety and depression. Is this the moral equivalent of murder? Probably. Is it the same as pulling the trigger? No. Why not? Because truth, and clarity in speech matter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Do Boeings actions help deter future whistle-blowers? Yes.

Finding the correct label seems irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What about tha other one a few weeks off from that one?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How are we supposed to keep track of all these Boeing whistleblowers suiciding themselves all over the place?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Let alone the ones they just maim.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Do you actually know anyone suicidal? They usually don't tell people. They often don't know themselves. They changed their mind. They're depressed. They're anxious. They're not well. They die suddenly. Everyone is surprised. That is how it goes.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How often do suicidal people reach out to a bunch of their friends and family just to specifically tell them they are NOT going to commit suicide?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That didn't happen. One grieving family friend said that he said that. John Oliver would have a field day with you people lol. Boeing has hurt and killed a lot of people. They do this like corporations do - by cutting staff, evading regulation, buying politicians. Boeing is liable for great harm. But focusing on these conspiracies rather than getting to the root of the problem -- that capitalism enables great harm by eroding our society -- isn't helping.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

So Corporations will break any law for profit besides murder?

I trust the guy's family more than the police lol, so do most people

You're really bending over backwards to push this narrative.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What "narrative"? It's on the Wikipedia page. It's not a narrative, it's what happened. Like... I really don't care that much about this specific case. It's more about the principle, the erosion of truth, the meaninglessness of facts. It's honestly the same type of thinking that makes right wing conspiracists and I don't want to capitulate to it. Focusing on a a salacious and improbable event downplays the real "evils" of capitalism, the smaller but cumulative things: the selfishness, the greed of everyday people and how profit motivated corporations enhance and multiply that. Contrapoints (Natalie Wynn) just did a fantastic video on conspiracies that touches on all three points. I would recommend it to anyone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Focusing on a a salacious and improbable event downplays the real "evils" of capitalism

That's the thing. These events are not just "salacious and improbable". These events are actually happening in front of our eyes and they need to be taken seriously. These events are happening as a direct result of capitalism, and not calling it out will just allow the right to set the narrative on those issues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

These conspiracies come as a direct result of capitalism. Everybody can plainly see when Boeing murders whistleblowers that it is because of money/their image.

Failure to talk about these conspiracies is a failure to point out the specific failures of capitalism.

Also I assume you actually meant conspiracy and not conspiracy theory.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Not telling people is a heck of a lot different from being about to blow the whistle on a major corporation and telling people "if anything happens to me, it's not suicide".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

How did "one family friend named Jennifer who can't believe it" turn into "all his family and friends"