this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
715 points (98.9% liked)
Funny
9510 readers
2271 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Everybody appropriates.
This language that you are speaking is appropriated from a bunch of other languages and cultures.
Is it appropriation if you treat people and their culture with respect? Because i dont think the issue here is how the KKK dresses. It is what they stand for ideologically and what they do. That is what makes it appropriation imo.
I want to agree with you, but I'm not so sure. I think different individuals have very different thoughts on that. And now I need to sit with this for a while.
Yes, has no inherent bias or prejudice.
Are you asking me?
That's true.
True, but there are nuances. Stealing a symbol and giving it new meaning by using it for a different purpose is obviously a worse kind of appropriation than adopting language and culture.
So it's not just regular appropriation, it's the bad kind of appropriation. Because they're bad.
Have I got that right?
Appropriation implies a form of exclusivity and denying the original's validity. As in:
KKK took that symbol and forever changed everyone's association with it to their own org.
It's not appropriation to use a thing, it's appropriation to treat your use of the thing as the correct/real one.
Yes. Cause it's different when I do it. I really have to sit with this.