this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1205 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

7472 readers
1621 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I wonder, why is 'literally' so special?

Someone steps out into unexpectedly cold weather and says, "It's freezing out here." But it's not below freezing.

Someone that hasn't eaten all day takes a bite and says, "I was starving, this is the best burger I've ever tasted!" They weren't really starving, and they probably didn't just rank every burger they've eaten.

We exaggerate and/or use words incorrectly for the effect so often, people are constantly using words "incorrectly" but then they say, "I'm literally dead right now." and dictionaries change their definitions and people point out semantics. It's like literally is figuratively magic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think "literally" should be an exception because it's the only word to clarify when we're not speaking figuratively. It's like making your safe word "fuck me harder".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

It’s almost like language is radically democratic and words only mean what we largely agree they mean, with fluctuating cases based on particular contexts.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah, somehow "literally" is the only word in a figure of speech that cannot be part of the figure at all! They are so smart for pointing that out

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"Freezing" is an exaggeration of "cold", just like "starving" is an exaggeration of "hungry". It's "a lot of X".

"Literally" is not an exaggeration, it's the opposite of "figuratively". It's "-X".

Those are two entirely different things. But of course inflammable means flammable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

“Literally” is not an exaggeration

Correct, it's an "intensifier"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And "terrific" and "awesome" are exaggerations of "scary".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. Am I meant to add anything here?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it's just another example that words' usages and meanings can change a lot, even flip, over time. A new usage can literally spread like a ~~~~virus~~~~ meme and become the meaning - at least to all intensive porpoises.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I know, it's completely normal. Doesn't mean I have to like a particular usage.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Incorrect.

Freezing
"Freezing is a phase transition in which a liquid turns into a solid when its temperature is lowered below its freezing point."

Starvation
"Starvation is a severe deficiency in caloric energy intake, below the level needed to maintain an organism's life."

You are literally wrong, and I will accept a 1-page apology written in MLA format before the end of this week.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I honestly do not see the contradiction. "Very cold" -> liquid turns to solid. "Very hungry" -> severe deficiency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then how do you explain iron, which freezes below 2,800 Fahrenheit, hm? 2,800 Fahrenheit is hot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Very" and "a lot" are subjective.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You cannot be "freezing" unless you are a bloodsicle. This follows from the exact definition of the word. Words have meanings, you know. If people can just say whatever they want, then what is the point of communication?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What part of that definition implies "bloodsicle"?

Not to mention how is that an answer to what I said?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Thank you for being so very elaborate, that cleared everything up. (It didn't.)