this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9561 readers
915 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to virtually all the polling, that choice is between Liberal Mark Carney and Conservative Pierre Poilievre. One wants to bring back fiscal prudence; the other, plastic straws.

Remarkably, the Liberals have held a five-to-seven-point lead in the polls from the beginning of the campaign, which they carry into the last, mad dash to the finish line.

In fact, according to the latest Nanos Research survey, Carney now leads Poilievre by six points. Several other polls, including on 338Canada, CBC/The Writ and Mainstreet Research, project a Liberal majority government of between 178 and 189 seats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 87 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Nobody wanted Trudeau, that much is true, but I think Poilievre mistook that to mean that people wanted him, that is not as true.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I find it telling that he doesn't seem to be able to understand that. It doesn't say much for his ability to negotiate or switch gears on the fly when needed.

If nothing else I think Trump, in his selfish way, helped us dodge a .50 cal bullet.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Charlie Angus the other day: “Donald Trump, I’m going to say this once—and I might never say it again—I want to thank you. I want to thank you for bringing Canada together.”

“It took a malignant narcissistic slug like you to make us put aside all our differences—all our regional fights, all our concerns with one another—and realize we actually had to stand up for something better: standing up for the rule of law, for democracy, for decency.”

Angus went on to hit out at Trump and his “incel gang” who are terrified of diversity, equity and inclusion, adding, “Your DEI nightmare? Well, we are your DEI nightmare, Donald. Canada will always be a country of diversity. We will always be a country of equity. We will always be a country of inclusion. And we will defend the rule of law.”

Edit: Source

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I wish this was true. I still see too much conservative support to believe it. Almost half of this country is clearly still a threat to our sovereignty and identity.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For many years places like the Fraser Insistute would point to the USA larger economy and more competitive salaries as why Canada should be copying their policies.

As usual the progressive arguments needed context like higher proverty rates or underlying social issues which to people that can barely make it past a article title is a largely lost cause. But in 2025 we can pretty just point to the flaming turd that is America and unless people are a special flavor of nuts they just kinda nod.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But he has a new slogan! Axe the inflation tax! It’s genius! It’s so good that this slogan will get people to vote for him, I know it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I never understood the excitement behind scrapping the carbon tax. Especially since it would mean that we'd just get hit with CBAM taxes when dealing with exports to the EU, and even less money coming back into our pockets. But hell yeah, industry gets to save billions while making our air more toxic! Woo!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

I actually love how Carney did it to be honest. He got rid of the consumer tax which took the wind out of PP’s sails while keeping the tax on producers so I don’t think we’ll get hit with CBAM (not an expert though)

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He is STILL invoking the ghost of Trudeau nearly every time he takes a question.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Pierre Poilievre, is the ghost of Justin Trudeau in the room with us?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You are right. I also feel like Carney is now the adult in the room. With the economic and other threats from USA he seems the strongest one to counter and that’s what we need. At least I hope he is the force he seems to be.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Watching the debates proved without a doubt that Carney is the only adult in the room. He was playing moderator during the debate consistently telling the other leaders to be quiet while the others were speaking and didn't interrupt others when they were speaking.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I didn’t want JT the last time I voted for him either but I would have voted again to prevent PP from being elected. I can’t think of any other conservative or any politician I’ve disliked as much, i like him less than Harper.

When asked by volunteers why I won’t vote conservative i said I won’t vote for a party and candidate that uses trump style nicknames like “carbon tax carney”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This sums my view up. I would have voted for Pierre, if it was him vs Trudeau. But....Carney came along and seems logical and competent. Plus I can't read or watch anything about the conservatives without them applying some grade-school level bullying tactic. Libs got my vote this time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

wait until you learn about the other parties

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

You were perfectly ready to cut off your nose to spite your face and that is the big problem with Canadian politics that will never be solved with electoral reform alone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

I'd have agreed, until it became obvious what a Trump-fellator Polievre had become. I think if Harris had won down south, even Carney couldn't have saved the Liberals. Charlie Angus was not wrong, the Liberals have Trump to thank if they win.