this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
1495 points (96.7% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3800 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Are people arguing the armorer, who left live ammunition in a gun, ISN'T responsible for the accident?? I don't understand who or what he's arguing against

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

People are arguing that both are at fault. The armorer is most clearly responsible. However, more than one person can be responsible for something.

A common rule of thumb is to never point a gun at something you don't want to kill. This is pretty clear outside the realm of a movie studio. On a movie set, it also seems pretty clearly 100% on the side of the armorer since pointing a gun at someone is required for acting. But Baldwin pointed the gun for fun, so it's a major gray area for a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I certainly understand the rules of firearm safety. I guess I was giving a pass to Baldwin given that the movie industry relies pretty heavily on the armourers and also they're just actors.

But that's a fair point, not caring about firearm safety isn't an option if you're using them as a part of your job. Especially if they're functional and not just props.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't need to point the gun at the director when you're acting, since the director is usually not in the film. IIRC, they were not filming at the time, they were rehearsing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He pointed the gun at the camera. He didn't kill the director.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The cinematographer was killed and the director was injured, my bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He was literally at work... He did it more for money than fun.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...people aren't allowed to have fun at work?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who said he wasnt having fun?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was off camera and not related to work at all.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It was on set and very much work related which is why a COWORKER died.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Army dude gave his take on the topic. Random person replied questioning his qualifications to talk about the subject. Army dude explained why he was qualified; he has indeed taken a weapon safety class, he’s led an entire squadron in armed combat. That’s the “don’t you know who I am”.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Regardless of the failure of physical controls, no one seems to be noting that safety training is also not Baldwin's responsibility.

I certainly don't look at a rich old hyperlib and think "Yeah, he knows this 'prop gun' is just an actual gun." I don't look at Baldwin and even think "He knows not to point this at something he isn't willing to destroy."

I wouldn't assume he knows a single thing about guns I didn't directly tell him and have him repeat back to me.