this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1082 points (97.8% liked)
Harry Potter
934 readers
180 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just ending the game would have been a good way to implement the snitch, tbh. It would have more strategy, more reasons to block the other seeker when you're behind. If there really had to be extra points, it should have been worth 10 points or something.
Yeah that's the reason quidditch is a dumb fucking sport. You can be wiping the floor with the other team, but if their guy gets lucky and catches the parking lot frog, it's all for nothing. They've won despite having played an objectively much worse game.
No you fucking can't. I know it happens twice in the books but it's such an absolutely convoluted thing. It's like when professionals will every now and then make careless mistakes. That doesn't make it a skill. If you're 160 points behind, don't grab it. That simple. The possibility that someone can drop a football by mistake before getting into the end zone is not some sort of strategy to plan around. No. It's something rare you hope for on the enemy team. If you catch the snitch, you win, because you wouldn't do it if you're behind by 160 or more points unless you made a very amateur mistake.
Bro is malding about a fictional game lmao 🤣
Yeah, I usually go down this same thought process every time I re-read the books. I usually end up at, "Yup, she went out of her way to avoid Quidditch by using feebler and feebler excuses every book." It's a shame, because it really could have wound up an exciting part of the series if it was more thought out.
It was worth 150 points. The equivalent of 15 goals. Do you mean 100 points and re-release it and continue playing?