this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1806 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

7275 readers
4652 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1806
Move the Overton Window (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no, they are earning votes the Democrats can't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And exactly what good are those votes doing if the Greens can't win any elections?

The point of running isn't to make nice speeches, it's to get elected and make real changes.

Again, what is the point if you never win?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the prohibition party never won, but they got a constitutional amendment.

the point is building a movement and demonstrating power.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Quick search shows that the Prohibition Party was established in 1868 and Prohibition was enacted in 1919. About 50 years later.

Greens were established in 2001. I guess that means you're willing to wait another 25 years for any substantive change.

Also, it's pretty funny that you can pay attention to the Prohibition Party and ignore the idea of vote splitting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You get funnier and funnier. I literally lol'd that one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if you don't know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This from the guy who needed 'splitting the vote explained'

You just keep getting funnier and funnier.

btw, uproarious laughter isn't considered a sign of petulance. It means 'sulky'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’

just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn't mean anyone needed to see it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Sure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to.

You're a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas.

You are talented and well-respected in your community.

Need any more affirmations?

After all the laughter you've given me, I feel like giving something back.