this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)
Casual Conversation
2962 readers
345 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Reply All was my favourite podcast and I miss it so much.
PJ Vogt started Search Engine and Alex Goldman recently started Hyperfixed which are both pretty good but neither come close to having the humour and chemistry of Reply All, not quite the interesting content.
Search Engine, for now, is s the better of the two, having done its feet since it started much earlier then Hyperfixed.
I loved casefile and used to listen to it all the time. Episode 54 haunts me to this day. I still cannot listen to Elton John's "Daniel" because of that case. I was out walking in public and when it got to Daniel's funeral, that little detail, that they played that song, absolutely wrecked me. I was ugly crying in public.
Also liked Dan Carlin! He's so calming to listen to. Should probably start listening to his podcast again sometime.
The world war 2 japan one was so good, I can't get the same itch scratched from most others tho.. But it was really, really good.
PJ Vogt's new podcast is called Search Engine and is a good substitute for Reply All.
Check out Hyperfixed by one of the former Reply All-hosts, and maybe also Hard Fork, which scratches a similar itch for me at least.