Canada

I thought that line was great.

Barton had gone too far, from the swearing in ceremony complaining that 13/11 male female split was biased to demanding that implying with all rules isn’t sufficient and he’s only in this for the rich.

The question itself was accusatory. I’m so tired of this kind of politics.

It’s also a huge double standard. How can we trust Polievre to work for Canada when he has significant rental properties totalling more than Carneys stocks, and energy stocks that his policies would instantly boost? Why aren’t they asking if he will recuse himself from all housing and energy decisions?

And that’s not to say we should settle for the lowest standard, but putting hood assets in a blind trust should be considered good.