118
Hegseth shutters Pentagon office that helped leaders plan for possible future wars
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
118 points (97.6% liked)
Military
359 readers
47 users here now
This community is dedicated to everything related to military. News, questions, and discussion.
RULES
1. Keep it civil. Self explanatory.
2. Refrain from inflammatory behavior. Criticism of the military is allowed here, but critique comments should be tied to the topic at hand. Vague low effort comments are not productive.
3. Memes on Mondays only. Everyone loves memes, but to keep them from overrunning other content, they are limited to Meme Mondays.
4. Posts must be coherent, and on topic to actual military discussion.
5. Posted articles should be titled in a way that does not materially alter the original title. Fixing a grammar or spelling mistake is acceptable, but omitting part of an article's title or naming the post differently in a way that diverges from the title is not allowed.
Dealing with PTSD and/or having thoughts about suicide?
Military/Veteran Crisis Line - 1-800-273-TALK (8255) - Press 1 or text 838255 or click here for 24/7 Confidential online support from a caring, qualified VA professional
Military One Source - 1-800-342-9647
Wounded Soldier and Family Hotline - 1-800-984-8523
DStressLine for Marines, attached Sailors, and families when it's needed most - 1-877-476-7734.
Vets4Warriors - 1-855-838-8255
CombatStress.org UK 24/7 Helpline 0800 138 1619
PTSD Resolution UK The PTSD Resolution charity's national counselling programme helps Veterans, Reservists and dependants resolve the symptoms of military trauma and reintegrate into normal work & family life. 0845 021 7873.
Talking2Minds UK was established with the sole purpose of helping those suffering from PTSD or other severe stress related conditions. They offer free Paradigm therapeutic programs to those most in need within the UK. If you have a general enquiry or would like to find out more, call 0791 712 6708 or email [email protected]
Related Communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Respectfully, I don't know how you could sit through his first four years, and definitely not the last six weeks, and dismiss anything he says out of hand at this point.
You are being unreasonable.
I do not do that, but a reasonable person must acknowledge Trump is not threatening the world with WW3.
Do you want ww3?
He specifically asked while in a position of absolute power…
The setting and situation definitely would suggest a threat to anyone. Not sure what’s so hard to understand about this.
Threatening with WW3 implies Trump would unleash WW3, you know that’s not the case.
Trump is warning Zelenskyy that escalating the war further has the potential to trigger WW3 with Russia escalating too and European countries joining the war.
The US is not interested in participating.
Oh yeah? Interesting.
Can you explain further.
What else do you want explained?
My bad, I thought you were interested in having a real conversation but instead you’re happy to resort to character attacks.
Context is important here.
When you’re in a position of power and trying to coerce your long term ally into submission, while simultaneously colluding with your historical enemy (who is actively attacking your prior ally), and you are threatening to remove aid from them if they don’t submit?
Then say “Do you want WW3?” twice… this constitutes a threat. An indirect threat is still a threat.
You trying to dance around the semantics disingenuously, is really what warranted my prior response—there was seemingly no chance at any understanding coming from engaging.
Likely still not the case…but hey, let’s try a thought experiment.
Let’s say I own a vehicle and I’m helping out a friend—letting them borrow it to commute to work. Without this vehicle they will 100% lose their job and livelihood, thus putting me in a position of control/power.
I request them to start paying for maintenance and bringing the car to a mechanic at specific times even though it will conflict with their job. Concerned about their livelihood, they decline and ask for more flexibility.
Knowing they 100% need this car to maintain a job, I give them an ultimatum of doing it at the specified time or I take the car away.
In my threat to take the car away, am I threatening that they will be fired?
In your example, you are threatening to take your car away from them. Your friend can still go to their jobs by some other means.
Besides, Ukraine is not an ally of the US, let alone a “long term ally”.
There is no dancing around semantics. Putin has threatened with WW3 several times but Trump hasn’t.
Way to completely disregard the analogy and the question I asked.
An indirect threat is still a threat no matter how much you try hard to get around it here.
I did not disregard your analogy and I answered your question.
Donald Trump made no threat, whether direct or indirect, of WW3. He warned Zelensky that should he choose to continue escalating, Zelensky risks triggering WW3.
If I see you play with fire near the fireplace, and I tell you that you are running the risk of lighting your house on fire, I have not threatened with lighting the house on fire.
Indirect threat is a threat. It’s understandable that this is hard for you as a pro Russian trump apologist.
It’s okay though, because the adults in the room got you covered.
Ah I see, instead of gracefully accept you’re wrong on this particular instance, you resort to personal attacks. Do better.