this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
488 points (92.4% liked)
Funny
8132 readers
530 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah salmon isnt' too hard and cod goes pretty easy in fishsticks basically, but I don't know how to optimise it. I don't get the feel for the meat like I do with when I cook, for example, steaks and want them rare. I mean yeah I do use a digital thermometer with steaks to get them optimal, but my point is I wouldn't even know with fish what the optimal is.
Like salmon and cod, yeah, easy enough and you find things at the store. But once I tried making soup out of this pike we caught and it was just... way overcooked. I messed it up, totally.
So I'd like to get that sort of intuitive feel and understanding I have for mammalian meat to fish meat as well. Like I understand with mammalian meat if it's fattier it'll cook differently, if it's this or that it'll affect it this way or that, but I don't know shit about fish, you know? Like if I was a millionaire, I'd hire a high-grade sushi chef to teach me about fish or something.
A sushi chef would be a poor choice to teach you about cooking fish!
But I understand. It really just takes practice.
Try a handful of different recipes with the same fish and you will start to get a feel for it. Then try a handful of recipes with a different fish. Etc. After getting the hang of a few of them, you'll be more comfortable with judging how and how long to cook the fish based on the filet or steak that you're working with--how thick or delicate the meat is.
For me, I was wary about chicken for the longest time when I first started cooking, afraid that I would undercook it. Same thing. It all just takes experience.
A sushi chef would be poor in teaching me about cooking fish, yes, but I believe I know cooking more than fish, and a sushi chef would be very good to teach me about fish.
You see? I can't communicate how amusing it is for me to stay "you see? " to you but I will try; you are Drusas, who one commented about my chosen nickname, as it was similar to yours.
The reason this amused me, or is ironic, is that my name is "Jussi", which sounds sort of like "you see". And the thing I like to do is mansplain. So... you see?
Nominative determinism.
I do always have a bit of a double-take when I see your username. It makes me think you have good taste, even though I don't know its origin.
But you're right that a sushi chef should be well acquainted with a variety of fish.
Probably shouldn't.
I was thinking more about imparting information about the nature, spirit, of fish.
If O understand that, it'll help me cook.
I think I would need you to elaborate.
Sorry, I was offensively drunk 7 hours ago when I wrote that.
I don't know how to elaborate on that anymore. Apologies.