this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
510 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

6367 readers
2414 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like:

People should be allowed to exist

Social programs aren't communism

The system isn't working for the people

Edit:

I've changed my mind on this.

Let the DNC go full MAGA and when they lose, because they will lose, they get the heat and we can eject them forever. At least sit them in a corner.

Progressives, you fight if you want but I don't believe the elections will be fair so it's a win win for you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm just saying if moderates are the solution, and we've been leaning on moderates since 2016, how is the framework of our government falling apart?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Last election people knew they had a choice between Donald Trump and status quo and eighty million people decided they didn’t give a fuck what happened.

I’d say that is a pretty good reason why the government is falling apart.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Moderates were at the helm my dude. They marched out all their best friends. Dick Cheney. Liz Cheney. Mike Pence.

Biden is poster boy moderate. He even brought us famous legislation like:

Student loan debt being unforgiveable

War on drug shit to save us from the "super criminals"

I'm not saying moderates aren't an important part of the GOP. Honestly they are sometime easier to be around. I just think they will appear pompous against a trump who is brilliantly an asshole and get creamed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Biden was right, Obama was right. Socially left and economically right was used as a smokescreen.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biden got one of the most progressive budget bills ever over the finish line. $800 billion dollars toward greening our infrastructure. You can’t blame him for not getting the green new deal passed, the mfer tried, it’s not his fault that 2 dems in the Senate nerfed it. Tried on student loan debt too, multiple times. The president is not a king.

Yes, his stance on Israel sucked, but Jewish people deserve to exist too. You can’t celebrate inclusion and then “to the river to the sea” a whole subset of people. Well I mean, I guess you can if you’re a hypocrite.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Biden uconditionally funded Israel's genocide. Zionism is about Settler Colonialism and Ethnic Cleansing of native Palestinians, not Judaism nor is it representative of Jewish people. Anti-zionism is not anti-semitism. The conflation of the two is genuinely antisemitic.

Zionism is anti-Semitic at it's core, it other-izes Jewish people, and justifies the violent settler colonialim of Israel as in the defense of all Jewish people, which only serves to further fuel genuine Antisemitism at the expense of Jewish people globally. Zionism is also an inherently fascist ideology. The ethnic cleansing of the native people of Palestine has always been fundamental since it's inception as a colonialist movement. Adi Callai, an Israeli, does a great analysis of how Antisemitism has been weaponized by Zionism during its history.

The slogan From the River to the Sea is about Palestinian liberation that started in the 60s by the PLO for a democratic secular state, not Genocide. The Syrian leader Hafez al-Assad in 1966 maybe, but he's not Palestinian. While there's been 500+ Instances of Israeli Incitement to Genocide – Continuously Updated, on top of Netanyahu explicitly stating “between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty.”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not insane enough to argue biden didn't do some stuff. I just believe and will continue to believe, he lost the real fight, and that was novemeber 2024 and the damage done will be irreparable.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you took all of the votes for Harris and gave them to the leading progressive candidate they still would have lost.

They’re a rounding error in democracy and the amount of change they’ve made reflects on that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

This is not how politics works. At all.

The democrats offered nothing and got nothing in return.

Perhaps if they offered something to people, like maybe reforming the healthcare system that will bankrupt you for a bandaid, I wonder if some of those nonvoters would have paid more attention.

Hmm... The world may never know...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I just don't think that's the end all be all answer to your argument. It's not as data driven as you might think. There is much more working under the hood then just shifting votes around.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In our system votes are literally all that matter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, so do a more rigorous analysis.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Want me to tell you how Rachele Fruit could have had a path to the presidency?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No.

If that were my argument I would but as you've hopefully read: I think your, "proof" is surface level and am not convinced.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Votes aren't solely made on ideological basis. If I think there is a subset not participating but they would under the right circumstances they wouldn't be a part of the calculation, either..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

By not voting they’ve taken themselves out of the equation and I’m not putting them back into it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, I don't care because I already know your calculation is based on feels.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, they’re cold hard facts based on the 2024 poll called the election.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll try not to cuss but you know and I know the polls were too close to call. So I don't know what we are doing here.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Between the conservatives and the moderates with the progressives trailing slightly behind Jill Stein.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh right. The "moderate" party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry you know I was talking about four parties there?

Two neck and neck and progressives in fourth place, not even on the podium.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Right, because any progressive not voting in the general for the dnc is just a loon.

Edit: come back with real numbers real data. What ever it is you think proves it for all to see. Go ahead. I won't play footsie anymore.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When their chosen candidate trails behind Jill Stein yes it’s kind of loony when the only real choice is Harris vs Trump.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So, it goes with out saying that thats not representive data?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Where are the progressive representatives in lower government then?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So we agree that voters do not want status quo? Because that's what moderates were offering.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No they wanted what Trump was offering.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

So what lesson are we going to learn from this in 2028? Continue running status quo moderates that no one actually wants?