this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
510 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

6367 readers
2414 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like:

People should be allowed to exist

Social programs aren't communism

The system isn't working for the people

Edit:

I've changed my mind on this.

Let the DNC go full MAGA and when they lose, because they will lose, they get the heat and we can eject them forever. At least sit them in a corner.

Progressives, you fight if you want but I don't believe the elections will be fair so it's a win win for you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I just don't think that's the end all be all answer to your argument. It's not as data driven as you might think. There is much more working under the hood then just shifting votes around.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In our system votes are literally all that matter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, so do a more rigorous analysis.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Want me to tell you how Rachele Fruit could have had a path to the presidency?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No.

If that were my argument I would but as you've hopefully read: I think your, "proof" is surface level and am not convinced.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Votes aren't solely made on ideological basis. If I think there is a subset not participating but they would under the right circumstances they wouldn't be a part of the calculation, either..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

By not voting they’ve taken themselves out of the equation and I’m not putting them back into it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, I don't care because I already know your calculation is based on feels.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, they’re cold hard facts based on the 2024 poll called the election.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll try not to cuss but you know and I know the polls were too close to call. So I don't know what we are doing here.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Between the conservatives and the moderates with the progressives trailing slightly behind Jill Stein.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh right. The "moderate" party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry you know I was talking about four parties there?

Two neck and neck and progressives in fourth place, not even on the podium.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Right, because any progressive not voting in the general for the dnc is just a loon.

Edit: come back with real numbers real data. What ever it is you think proves it for all to see. Go ahead. I won't play footsie anymore.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When their chosen candidate trails behind Jill Stein yes it’s kind of loony when the only real choice is Harris vs Trump.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So, it goes with out saying that thats not representive data?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Where are the progressive representatives in lower government then?