Privacy

5040 readers

348 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

Be civil
No spam posting
Keep posts on-topic
No trolling

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

791

Mozilla flamed by Firefox fans after promises to not sell their data go up in smoke (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

188 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The answer to "what is Firefox?" on Mozilla's FAQ page about its browser used to read:

The Firefox Browser is the only major browser backed by a not-for-profit that doesn’t sell your personal data to advertisers while helping you protect your personal information.

Now it just says:

The Firefox Browser, the only major browser backed by a not-for-profit, helps you protect your personal information.

In other words, Mozilla is no longer willing to commit to not selling your personal data to advertisers.

A related change was also highlighted by mozilla.org commenter jkaelin, who linked direct to the source code for that FAQ page. To answer the question, "is Firefox free?" Moz used to say:

Yep! The Firefox Browser is free. Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it, and we don’t sell your personal data.

Now it simply reads:

Yep! The Firefox Browser is free. Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it.

Again, a pledge to not sell people's data has disappeared. Varma insisted this is the result of the fluid definition of “sell” in the context of data sharing and privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We shouldn't have to do workarounds like that in the first place. It's getting to be like the Stockholm syndrome people have about Windows abuses. I didn't put up that shit, and I'm not gonna put up with this either.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago

I'd be more worried about how long that flag is going to work. And how long is it going to take us to realize the flag isn't working.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm running Linux and neither Waterfox or LibreWolf are present in repository of one of the most popular distros. Come on?!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

You aren't using the Flatpak?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you are using a debian flavor, you can likely add extrepo that searches a central repo of repositories and can add them as needed.

sudo apt update && sudo apt install extrepo -y

sudo extrepo enable librewolf

sudo apt update && sudo apt install librewolf -y

[+] [email protected] -10 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Why always this Terminal bullshit? Why can't I just find it and click Install like a normal user and not like a fucking caveman?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

typing 2-3 words isnt something that abnormal users do. if installing something as basic as browser using CLI is hard for you, then youre better off not using computer at all. it literally takes less time and effort to open terminal and type few words (or just copy paste) and spam enter enter enter. you just need to change your perspective. downloading a deb/appimage/tar/whatever file or opening app store takes more time, clicks and effort.

edit : i use arch btw, installing librewolf seems easier on arch than debian. just type "yay librewolf" and spam enter key.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Thats what flatpaks, appimages, .deb files and snaps are for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Which distro?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

huh? what linux distribution are you even using? also librewolf is available in the flathub repository

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

put it innare