this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
210 points (97.7% liked)
Technology
61456 readers
4617 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Got curious and went to the original page, and it is literally just one sentence vague announcement:
Really not sure what they actually launched the antitrust probe for; this is just pure political drama lol
Edit: Okay, it is possibly because of Android dominance, but again, still a political drama
Are you really not sure? Say what you will about China, but let's shelf that for a minute. Much like meta, google is an ever spreading cancer that tries to insert itself into every person's life and has unlawfully used their trust position to do so everywhere in the world. Regardless of Chinese motivations, odds are google has violated anti-trust there too.
Google sure is a cancer, but you are not putting it in the context. They literally only provide two major services in Mainland China:
So,
From this standpoint, there is no visible reason for an antitrust probe in China.
Edit: After digging into China's antitrust law, they do include laws that allows investigations into companies that is monopoly overseas as long as the company has business in China. So yeah, they do have reasons.
Virtually any smartphone manufacturer in China apart from Huawei and Apple pay licensing fees to Google. Sounds very monopoly when tens of manufacturers pay licensing fees to the same company. Right or wrong motivation there's a compelling case unless one hits the great mental firewall of "China bad".
Okay, you are possibly right here. After digging into China's law, they do include laws that allows investigations into companies that is monopoly overseas as long as the company has business in China.
But my end point still stands; this is still a very specific time to start the investigation, Android dominance is definitely a part of cause, but in the end it is just a part of political drama between two asshole governments that end up not benefiting both county's people
It's not political drama, they were happy to look the other way when there was a quid pro quo. There isn't one anymore so they enforce their own laws. It's 2025 not 1825, we're not right just because we speak English. Although I'm sure a non insignificant portion of the US executive would be more than happy to blockade Beijing and make it rain artillery fire.
The US was also happy to look the other way when Uyghur slaves were manufacturing components for Apple. It's just normal geopolitics.
How did they, if their products aren't even available in China?