this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
199 points (95.9% liked)

Games

17256 readers
224 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why is trillions in quotes? Did they add them or not?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I write a planet generator. All of the planets are the same to begin with, so realistically I can only generate "1" planet. Then I add one toggle which is random, if it's on the planet will be completely water. I now have "2" planets. Now I add another toggle for one huge mountain, I can now generate "4" planets (dry,water,dry-mountain,water-mountain). Keep adding toggles, sliders and parameters until you have "trillions" of possible planets and you're done.

The funny thing is that the changes are cumulative, so if I release a game that can generate X planets and I add a binary toggle I can now claim I added X planets to the game. If I add a slider from 0-9 then I added 10X planets. So since No Man's Sky already had a giant number of planets, adding trillions of them could mean something as stupid as they added a new resource to the game so now every planet can have that resource in different amounts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I thought I'd check which 2^N gets you to a trillion, it's N=40. So you can have 40 parameters per planet and add one more, then suddenly you've created an extra trillion planets.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

And that's assuming just toggles, if each parameter has 10 levels you only need 12, then add one toggle and you get trillions. Heck, I can name 12 parameters that have at least 10 different values off the top of my head:

  1. Amount of water overall (oceans and lakes)
  2. Amount of mountains
  3. Amount of Forrest on the land
  4. Amount of life forms
  5. Temperature
  6. Amount of moons/rings
  7. Size
  8. Amount of rivers
  9. Whether the landmass is one big continent or multiple small islands
  10. Amount of volcanoes
  11. Amount of caves
  12. Amount of iron (or any other resource)

Congrats, if you now add a does the planet rotate toggle you've created trillions of planets.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s a procedurally generated universe(s). These systems haven’t all been pre-generated, but will rather be generated to explore when a player visits a system for the first time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, but that still counts. Although I guess it's kind of an "if a tree falls in the forest" question. If the world doesn't exist unless you find it, was it really there before?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The point is rather how meaningful this statement is. It doesn't really matter if your algorithm can come up with trillions of ways to place trees, if it's the same handful of trees it's still gonna feel samey after the third time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago