this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
85 points (76.7% liked)

Fediverse

29219 readers
1502 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi! In thinking about how to help the fediverse grow, I wonder if there are more mainstream Lemmy instances?

I've pointed a couple folks to Lemmy.world and it's uhhh, pretty hard Left for them (as one girl, who volunteered for the Democrats said "I just got yelled at because I can't be Left wing unless I want to destroy capitalism? Which feels weird.") We're much farther Left than reddit which itself was definitely Left of centre...

I don't know if decentralized open source social media actually attracts many mainstreamers but assuming we want to grow the fediverse, I'd like to have somewhere I can point people to without feeling very nervous for them.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Roughly speaking, Lemm.ee is more libertarian some libright. Slrpnk is libleft but is home to pleasant politics community. Dbzer0 is anarchy leftist. World is closest to US centrist. Lemmy.ca is kind of Reddit's onguardforthee vibe, Left/NDP wing.

Thing is that influences from other more ideological instances will make it onto All threads. "Lib-shaming" is something some folks at lemmy.ml, hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml like to do frequently, which is where those experiences might have come from.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Please, Slrpnk may by attractive for different kind of people due to aesthetic and design buy its core philosophy is not Lib, is Anarchy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Lib shaming is for good reason as the US and most of the western world falls to fascism thanks to libs creating the material conditions for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

(as one girl, who volunteered for the Democrats said "I just got yelled at because I can't be Left wing unless I want to destroy capitalism? Which feels weird.")

I get why folks do it, but I'm not sure if they're going to get people to embrace their philosophy, if they keep jeering at other people like this. There are more cordial ways that one can acknowledge the benefits while showing why the drawbacks outweigh them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Can vouch for this. I learned a thing or two from people who had the patience to explain. Including some ML people. @[email protected] for example has nerves of steel. Permanent snark isn't useful but it's understandable, especially coming from people who are being actively harmed. Repeating the same things over and over without frustration isn't something everyone can do.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Appreciate the kind words! You're 100% correct in saying that snark isn't useful but is understandable. Many good people are being actively harmed and are out of patience in explaining how and why said harm exists, and how we can move beyond it. That isn't even mentioning the outright hostility many Leftists face in general, on a daily basis. Ultimately, what I've found is that most people aren't going to be convinced of something that seriously challenges their worldview in a single conversation, but through compatible life experiences make themselves more open to new ideas. Those are the ones that end up listening to others genuinely and taking to heart what the other person has to say.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

While I do think some ways of communicating are certainly more effective than others, social change also requires some amount of tension to be effective. Cordial methods are often the first to be tried, and are also most often summarily ignored.

Moderates often find tension emotionally distressing because it pierces their perception of themselves as a morally just person. They sometimes perceive what is often valid criticism as being yelled at. This tension is required in order to enact social change, though.

As someone who has been on the receiving end of that tension before, I can attest it's an unpleasant experience, but it passes, and hopefully leaves room for some amount of contemplation in its place.

I'd highly recommend reading MLK's "Letter from Birmingham Jail", as he bridges the concept much more eloquently than I could ever hope to.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Queer people like myself are currently in the crosshairs and don’t have the energy or patience to put up with this shit.

I’ve been screaming from the top of my lungs since 2000!!!! about how we were heading towards fascism and nobody listened. I’m out of fucks to give. If they’re too stupid to see it that’s on them. In my book lib shit behavior is complicit in the rise of fascism.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Then maybe don't waste energy being shitty online and instead build the local community and personal resources to protect your ass.

If I was in your situation looking at the changes Trump did in just the executive orders his first day, I can tell you one thing that would be at the absolute fucking bottom of my todo list: argue on the fucking internet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I’m currently extremely ill and bedridden with a painful and dangerous dental infection that I’m struggling to get adequate treatment for thanks to capitalism.

But yeah, do tell me how to live my life. Typical liberal scolding.

Also I LOVE the assumption that I don’t normally make community when I’m well. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I have to say it again:

  • Fascists promise to do fascist things
  • Americans elect fascists
  • Fascists do fascist things
  • HOW COULD DEMOCRATS DO THIS???
[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago

It's a bit more like:

  • Capitalism creates the material conditions that promote fashism

  • Democrates aren't fashists, but they keep capitalism

  • The material conditions that promote fashism end up happening and fashism props up

  • Fashists end up getting elected

The point isn't that the Democrats are fashists, but that they would rather continue support the thing that litterally empowers fashism rather than doing anything else. Kinda like a person who refuses to get vaccinated and spreads a disease to everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And I have to say it again: libs created the material conditions to let it happen. Obama bailed out Wall Street instead of Main Street. People aren’t born fascist. They become it. Twice Obama voters switching to trump is great example of that and as usual democrats say nuh uh im not listening!!!!!!