this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
170 points (97.2% liked)

Science

3401 readers
132 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If we were a smarter society, we’d end our stupid cold war with them and cooperate.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If they were a more humane society, we likely would.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

More humane like Nazi-America, or more humane like Warcrimes-Russia? Description unclear, please clarify.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

More humane like the best of us wish to be and the majority of us never will be

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To clarify, what you're doing is "what-aboutism". Asking China to be more humane is not a comment on anything but China being more humane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Honestly China might start looking moderate compared to what I expect our new Dear Leader to do in the coming years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They weren't just asking China to be more humane, though. They were suggesting that China doesn't deserve our cooperation because they are inhumane, which implies we have the moral high ground and is explicitly hypocritical. It isn't whataboutism to point out hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a lot of assuming, implying, and suggesting in that take. The original just said if they were more humane we would work with them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't at all see how that implies moral superiority? Or are you just giving them the benefit of the doubt?

The problem is holding China to a higher standard than we hold ourselves to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean I could see how you could get that but it's not how I read it. I read it as they are not humane enough to effectively collaborate with.

I mean, listen, America is a huge hypocrisy so I'm not saying people aren't doing that, I guess I just read it more literally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's a bad take either way, and that interpretation makes way less sense. The reason we don't collaborate with China is geopolitical, and has nothing to do with ethics or China being too inhumane to effectively collaborate with (whatever that means).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

I mean, I'm aware of the actual reason, I've never argued that lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

More humane as in respecting human rights I suppose

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Yeah more humane like Israel… America has been installing dictators all around the world for decades what are you talking about? You think America cares about humanity? You cant even birth a child without a $10,000+ bill.

America cares about moneyyyyy and nothing more