this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
1261 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
8 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm happy to see this being noticed more and more. Google wants to destroy the open web, so it's a lot at stake.

Google basically says "Trust us". What a joke.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Web protocol? Which one?

I wouldn’t consider http or dns bloated, for instance. And tcp/ip isn’t web-specific enough for me to think that’s what you mean by “the web protocol”.

Are you just trying to say you don’t like websites in a way that sounds techy?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s a rant about the complexity of modern browser engines, not the protocols. The web worked just fine before CSS and JS. The protocols aren’t the problem. Lynx is still being maintained if you want the web without the bloat of features like js and inline images.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe the rant demonstrates there cannot be more competition for browsers and therefore justifies the idea that browsers will stagnate and come to an end. I think the solution will be to move away from one application doing many things to using separate software dedicated to narrow purposes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, I do the same in my kitchen. One machine that does one job and then sits around unused for the rest of the year.

No, obviously that is not the way. I don't want to deal with 20 separate programs to do the job Firefox does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When you want to use the scanner but can't because the printer is broken.