this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
628 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60606 readers
3280 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And they're already kissing Trump's ass

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Tik Tok removed platform access from their US userbase voluntarily.

This was their choice.

The law is literally not even being enforced.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago)

Bytedance's long-term hope is naturally to be able to continuing operating everywhere without violating any laws. Right? Therefore, their strategy is to stay as compliant as possible with various national laws (within reason), right? Therefore they have to take a conservative reading of the bill (PAFACA). So let's look at the text of the bill:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521/text

(1) PROHIBITION OF FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS.—It shall be unlawful for an entity to distribute, maintain, or update (or enable the distribution, maintenance, or updating of) a foreign adversary controlled application by carrying out, within the land or maritime borders of the United States, any of the following: [...]

Now, the actual distribution of TikTok is done by a U.S. corp, incorporated in California and Delaware. That corp has to stay compliant with these laws. Therefore, to maintain or update or enable the distribution of an app as defined in this bill, is legally punishable. Make sense? Particularly because the law mentions them by name, there is basically zero legal defense against it besides contesting its constitutionality. Which the horrifically corrupt Supreme Court upheld.

So, probably the only way they felt comfortable resuming operations in the U.S. was with some kind of written agreement with the Trump admin - as of yet undisclosed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Multiple apps must have done so.

That's what I see when I search for Marvel Snap on the playstore. Someone mentioned it was down as well earlier

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because they are distributed by a company that is owned by Bytedance. You know. The people who own Tik Tok.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, that's why I brought that one up

[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I hear that businesses existing in the face of unenforced laws are really stable and enduring. \s

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

Large businesses literally operate in conflict with the law until the law directly forces consequences, usually in monetary form. So, until they get caught and are forced not to do the thing. Explain to me why this is any different.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Noteworthy thing I haven't seen mentioned here: They apparently only removed app access. The website still works just fine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

The website didn’t work from US IPs last night, but it’s back already.