this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
637 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60606 readers
3267 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And they're already kissing Trump's ass

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 231 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And now Trump gets to be the one who saved TikTok, despite starting the process.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's an own-goal for Biden - an unpopular law that starts being enforced the day before Trump gets to stop enforcing it.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No one is enforcing it, it's a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily. The server is still there, my wife logged in and saw the notice.

It's just theater.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily

Yup. In fact, Biden had specifically said he will not enforce the ban.

Which, incidentally...might be the same thing Trump does to "unban TikTok" once he takes office. Which is bizarre, on both sides. Like...that's literally not legal for a president to do. They can't legally just ignore an Act of Congress.

Not that the law matters in America anymore. The Supreme Court has pretty definitively seen to that.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just 'ignore' the law.

the only thing the 'president' can do is extend the deadline by 90 days given evidence that the company is closing-in on a deal.

with scotus out of the way, ruling in favor of trump's initial desires, and that which subsequently passed through congress; it is now up to congress to undo the legislation if they so choose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Not sure that is true though. When I read the law it specifies that the President can choose to block ANY foreign owned social media site that they (as in the president) deems a national security threat. So Trump could in theory say ban RedNote tomorrow and it legally would have to be done. That said.. he may be able to just say "bytedance is not considered a national security threat at this time" and that may be enough to let TikTok continue to be in the U.S.

I'd have to read it again to confirm

Edit: nah ByteDance got targeted hard, no dodging that.


DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT

Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

(Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok). However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.

Under the division, a foreign adversary controlled application is an application directly or indirectly operated by (1) ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok, their subsidiaries, successors, related entities they control, or entities controlled by a foreign adversary country; or (2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. (Here, a social media company excludes any website or application primarily used to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

In practice, there's no real mechanism to force it (especially if Congress is unwilling to impeach & convict). But legally speaking, the Take Care clause of the constitution obligates the President (through his executive) to enforce all laws passed by Congress. Ignoring it would be unconstitutional.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

When has trump ever cared about the constution?

You’re talking about the guy who wants to end birthright citizenship.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

LOL WTF does he care about the constitution? He's a fucking felon. And clearly no one in government cares about the constitution either.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

The executive branch can selectively enforce laws, look at all the weed dispensaries the feds could just waltz into and have a federal case against everyone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

$10 says Trump influenced TikTok to go dark today to make him look better when it turns it back on tomorrow.

We all know they didn't actually have to do this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TikTok and its service providers are liable. "No one is enforcing" is meaningless, because they can still be prosecuted retrospectively if the US Government changes its mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yup. They even asked for clarification on the "no enforcement" and the Biden administration basically just said "it is what it is".

What big company is going to take a risk like that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

What are they risking, exactly? The entire company has essentially been banned from the country, so they have nothing to lose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Being fined for not doing what the people in power what them to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

Hmmm existing with fines vs. not existing. Quite a dilemma.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

What big company is going to risk a fine tomorrow for profit today? Literally all of them?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not sure why you think it's an own goal. Biden didn't set the day for it to take effect, that was written into the law by Congress. You could say it was an own goal because Biden announced he wasn't going to enforce it, but that seems to be the opposite of what you're trting to claim And even with that decision to not enforce the law for 1 day before the Trump admin takes over, none of the companies TikTok works with like Apple or Google to list it in the app stores gave a shit about that lack of enforcement because of the uncertainty.

Not to mention Trump being the start of the ban in the first place. He was President when all of this started to work it's way through the process, even if Biden was the President when it actually made it through Congress, with bipartisan support. Trump only changed positions because he wants TokTok to pay him to continue to allow it to continue.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More Americans have TikTok accounts than vote. For a shitload of normies who have only the vaguest notion of politics and current affairs, the app they've been enjoying gets cut off as the defining event of the waning days of the Biden administration. They are not going to care about how Trump tried to do it first, or it was bipartisan, or whatever. It's hard not to see how this will cost Dems dearly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No it won't. Biden is already out of office as far as normies are concerned. He has been since the election, but definitely within 24 hours of inauguration. TikTok stops working and the next thing they see is Trump having a huge party with a shit ton of pomp and circumstance for his inauguration as he gets into the White House. And then TikTok still doesn't work when they open it up. Maybe he brings it back, maybe he doesn't. Voters don't pay enough attention to separate his inauguration and the TikTok ban happening 24 hours apart, they'll bundle it together as one event.

Unless he gets a massive cash infusion from Bytedance in the next 24 hours, he won't give TikTok an extension on day one in office. He's the kind of person that expects his payment up front.

So everyone will instead see it stop working as President Trump takes over, and then it continuing to not work after. Some may give him the benefit of the doubt, but they weren't ever going to vote for anyone else anyway, he's their God Emperor President and they've confirmed their world view around him being perfect.

Heck, he might try to spin it as some sort of promotional opportunity for Truth Social.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The law isn't being enforced. TikTok can just put it back up tomorrow and imply it was Trump that did it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That won't stop Apple and Google from keeping it pulled from app stores until things are more concrete.

TikTok only blocked access and put that notice up in the app after their partners decided that a statement from the outgoing administration 24 before the transition wasn't enough for them to not comply with the law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

Well, it definitely looks to have backfired on US government. The politicians figured that they could force Bytedance to divest TikTok using a ban in the US as a threat, assuming that TikTok wouldn't want to lose access to the US market and the 180 million or so (!) users. Instead of complying, ByteDance did nothing and the politicians and the US government were put into a position of actually enforcing a very unpopular ban.

The timing of course is interesting. This comes right at the end of Biden's administration, allowing for Trump to swoop in and lift the ban and take all the credit for that. Of course ignoring that is was Trump who originally kicked this whole thing into motion back in 2020 with his executive order to ban TikTok.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

As designed by the republicans. There are legitimate reasons to regulate tiktok, if Biden opposed though, they'd say he was a weak Chinese sympathizer, if he complied, they'd do this.

It was a trap where you were fucked either way, as the republican think tank ghouls drew it out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Didn't Biden specifically say that enforcement was up to Trump?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Democrats getting played by Republicans, a classic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/tiktok-and-white-supremacist-content/

No wonder why Trump wants to "save" TikTok. It has the stuff Republicans crave.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

There's still loads of bullshit surrounding the name. Hope your personal filters are up to the task the next 4 years.