this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
65 points (68.2% liked)

Technology

60606 readers
3647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're right, but I think less dense but safer and more sustainable options are the better choice for this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We can all agree on that, Clearly li-ion is a bad choice for static use cases.

But right now it’s the cheapest option, and it looks likely that will stay true for quite a while unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's the densest option. The cheapest is probably salt/water or iron/water using scrap

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

LIthium Iron Phosphate is cheapest relatively dense battery type. Sodium ion will be if lithium get expensive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can draw an arbitrary line of density you find good enough. But with how much space us wasted in some countries, that line should vary a bit place to place

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With 40 foot containers providing utility or smaller scale storage solutions of 2.9mwh per container with LFP batteries, that is about 170mwh per acre. Before stacking. I don't believe a lack of density matters anywhere in the world. Spare space inside buildings is usually sufficient for building needs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

A lack of density definitely matters in some places. I've been to a bunch of countries now, some have plenty of space, some really don't

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Weirdly it’s not, except maybe gravity batteries where nice reservoirs happen to exist already. It should be but it’s not right now.

Li-ion has economy of scale right now. I do think molten metal etc will overtake eventually, but they’re currently playing catchup and li-ion has dropped in price so much over time that it’s surprisingly cheap even where it should make no sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't say molten metal, what? No just a standard chemical battery

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know, I just threw out one of the many contenders for grid power.

Iron water does look promising too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Ahh, that makes more sense. I misunderstood