Programmer Humor

32721 readers

361 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

522

Pride Versioning (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I've noticed this and seeing it all laid out is hilarious. (So, so many JS frameworks omg)

Is this basically so they can forever say: "Well don't expect it to be feature complete, it's not even 1.0 yet!" ??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I don't think, it's as conscious of a decision. Projects above a certain level of complexity will just never realistically reach the criteria one might associate with a 1.0 (stable API, no known bugs, largely feature-complete). And then especially non-commercial projects just don't have an incentive to arbitrarily proclaim that they fulfill these criteria...