this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
521 points (99.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32721 readers
358 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I've noticed this and seeing it all laid out is hilarious. (So, so many JS frameworks omg)

Is this basically so they can forever say: "Well don't expect it to be feature complete, it's not even 1.0 yet!" ??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I don't think, it's as conscious of a decision. Projects above a certain level of complexity will just never realistically reach the criteria one might associate with a 1.0 (stable API, no known bugs, largely feature-complete). And then especially non-commercial projects just don't have an incentive to arbitrarily proclaim that they fulfill these criteria...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I'm afraid most, if not all, of the projects listed use pride versioning, also.

[–] AnActOfCreation 5 points 1 day ago

This is hilarious