this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
284 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59993 readers
2652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
284
US targets TP-Link with a potential ban on the Chinese routers (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TP-link is reportedly being investigated over national security concerns linked to vulnerabilities in its very popular routers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, something like a dumb switch or PoE injector shouldn't cause any problems since they don't really have any exploitable logic, and they're behind a router anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Really not sure how much tech they have in them. I'm more familiar with PoE and switches. The Ethernet to 110 to Ethernet I guess is just pulses being sent to transmit the data over power lines within the residence, but yeah I agree it is behind the router. That doesn't say someone couldnt hack say a smart fridge and pick data off the same power and then transmit that data back through a backdoor. But then again that fridge would be behind the router as well. Idk, havent spent much time looking at any of it. It would have to mimic the sync signal used by the receiver though, not sure what security protocols are there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Unless you're operating a military base or something, you'll be fine with anything that's not "smart." I don't trust most "smart" devices unless I can self-host them (e.g. block them from phoning home).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Probably wise, thankfully I don't have to many smart devices... Even my microwave/air fryer combo started shooting sparks out of another outlet on the breaker. Unplugged it and decided to use it as a cat treat holder for now. He can't open that... Cabinets though..