Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
It was a landslide... if you don't count all these populous states. This site is propaganda for babies.
He received 31% of the vote from all the population who could vote.
That's roughly 1.5% less than the percentage of votes Reagan got from eligible voters in 1984. Was that election not a landslide also?
Less than 1 in 3 people voting for a candidate is not a landslide.
If you don't think Reagan's victory in 1984 that's fair even if I disagree. I was just asking for consistency, which you seem to have.