this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
245 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9887 readers
3 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/20009882

Car tires shed a quarter of all microplastics in the environment. Urgent action is needed

Electric cars are not THE solution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

We need flying hover cars. Imagine if we could get rid of all the cement and asphalt everywhere. Also no more traffic jams.

A sci-fi nerd can dream.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

do you genuinely imagine this working? like, you see what people are like driving cars on the ground, right? do you think people would actually manage to not get drunk and think it's a great idea to reenact 9/11?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

The inherent problem of any car at all is that people should never personally need a personal vehicle worth thousands to tens of thousands of dollars to buy milk and eggs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And only 1000x the energy usage!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And dramatically reducing crash survival rates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

And even maybe creating a sort of car-Kessler syndrome.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

these will never be a thing. Noise

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Just need room temp super magnets so that the cars can "float" at a particular level of the magnetosphere. Don't worry Mlon Eusk is about five minutes away from personally cracking that physics problem and will be selling cars utilizing it for generational debt tomorrow./s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Great idea! So long as the current safety laws for aviation are followed. That would disqualify most people from flying and dramatically reduce the number of personal vehicles in use.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah man, we need the tubes. Hop in a tube pod and ride the tubes to any destination.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We can move the tubes more efficiently by making them large enough for many people, then chaining the various tub- hold up we invented trains again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Do they at least look like crabs?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Revolutionary!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We need a strict speed limit. 30mph should be enough for everybody.

No chance this will ever happen though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

honestly even that is significantly too high anywhere near where people live, what i'd go with is a default limit of 30km/h and a 60km/h limit on motorways, which should be constructed more like railways are: sparingly and with safe crossings (ideally grade-separated).

30km/h is enough to go a pretty generous distance in an acceptable amount of time, certainly enough for even the sprawliest urban areas, and the motorways extend how far you can go in an acceptable amount of time without significant downsides.

This is largely what the netherlands does and it works well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@Swedneck @luckystarr The Netherlands doesn't have the sprawliest of urban areas, but that is because those just don't work, so don't have them ;)

Yes, 30/60 is pretty reasonable once driving isn't the only way for people to get around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

the netherlands has extreme urban sprawl as most of the country is one urban area :3

but yeah sure in the US you can add another tier of motorsuperhighways (that idiotic name is mandatory so drivers know how it feels to bike in london) with a 100km/h speed limit, to be built even more sparingly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

No chance Louis XVI would have given the people of France a decent standard of living either. Things change when enough people can no longer tolerate how they are or how they are going.