Privacy

1321 readers

24 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon

danielintempesta

Why do criminals use their own encrypted messaging platforms, instead of using any of the recommended apps? (www.europol.europa.eu)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/privacy

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does that mean that other apps like signal for example have back doors?

Do criminals have a knowledge of exploits in the recommended messaging apps?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RonSijm 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It probably depends on the level of the criminals and organized crime groups. I saw this Youtube video a couple weeks ago that talks about the history of how organized crime groups were using encrypted communication https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gigIOc_0PKo (And how they were honey-potted by the FBI to use an FBI-hosted service, lol)

Organized crime groups that make 100s of millions should be capable enough to hire skilled developers and sysops to host self-managed services. At some point if they make enough money, investing in self-managed communication becomes preferable over using telegram or signal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There are multi million companies that get hacked left and right, money does not mean intelligent security measures.

Also, best option is the big ones, anyone who wants real security and privacy should use something that already exists. Sure, maybe not signal (even though for anything less then a state actor it is plenty) but there are plenty of self-hosted or decentralized communication apps out there.

Anyone who builds their own app is very likely making a bad decision.

Just a reminder that one of the most wanted man in the world by the most capable state in the world (Snowden) is using signal