196

16732 readers

2399 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

765

firefox rule (slrpnk.net)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

123 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

wat. lol. javascript has nothing to do with the memory consumption. just humans being shitty at their jobs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I will agree with you that VANILLA JavaScript isn't to blame, but all the frameworks and packages are.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, being shitty at their jobs. even the frameworks/packages are not to blame. its which you pick and how you use them.

for peoples context: just checked a few sites most range in the 30MB-150MB per page. which is pretty reasonable for the complexity of the websites involved. one included a streaming service actively playing a video.

Its just that these things add up across 100 tabs.