this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
11 points (86.7% liked)

AskTransgender

254 readers
26 users here now

A place to ask transgender people questions and get answers about the trans experience.

Rules:

  1. Respect other people's identities

  2. No Fetishizing Trans people

  3. No Gatekeeping about not being "trans enough"

  4. No Inciting Drama

  5. No personal Agendas

  6. Posts should encourage discussion

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
11
How reliable is the "Shinigami Eyes" browser extension for you? (lemmy.eco.br)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For those who don't know, it's a browser extension that marks a link to a group or person determined by how they act towards trans people.

I personally like this concept, but after reading the reviews on its Firefox add-ons page, it let me a bit worried. I found a Reddit post with one person commenting that someone marked their friends' blog as unwelcoming due to personal beef. On that same post, people were writing about how they used it just as a "suggestion".

So, returning to the question in the title, do you personally find this extension reliable/usable? Does it could have anything that should be worked better?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Not using it, but AFAIK it uses a bloom-filter internally which is a datastructure that is known to come with unavoidable false positives. AKA: Even if the database was 100% free of errors and only contained actually transphobic people, the extension would still mark a lot of completely innocent accounts as transphobic, simply because the data-structure returns wrong results at times.

Based on that alone you should treat any and all results as “warrants a closer look” at most. With even that being a questionable use: People with dark skin are more commonly non-EU foreigners in Europe than white people, but every sane person agrees that the police checking dark skinned people more often is racial profiling, which is racist, should be illegal, and is just a bad thing to do. So taking a closer look at people because of something they cannot control that isn’t directly tied to them personally (skin-color or positive match in a bloom filter) is a questionable practice to begin with.

Lastly: What does it change? The validity of an argument is not affected by whether the person who made it is a transphobe or not.