this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
317 points (88.2% liked)

science

14858 readers
159 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Time to start eating bacteria now, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Maybe hundreds of years from now we can synthesize nutrients without involving any living cells. At that point, it could be seen as unethical to enslave, murder and eat billions of microbial cells. For the time being, our life still depends on other living things, so better get comfortable with having mixed feelings about survival.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Technically we can, it's just so expensive as to be completely out of the question.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Doing chemistry by mixing chemicals is like fumbling in the dark. You tend to have ridiculously low yield, because you can’t really control which reaction takes place. It’s just a game of probabilities, which makes this gamble really expensive.

Living cells are doing chemistry the right way by combining specific materials and making specific products. Enzymes are very picky, but with them you can actually control the reactions. Making enzymes is just next level complexity and a story for another time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Isn’t that basically what nutritional yeast is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Bacteria already release stress chemicals when their food is lacking, so...