this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
36 points (77.3% liked)

UK Politics

3087 readers
2 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Also, those claiming to have no source on Powell being on the team that negotiated Pinochet's release, only prove they've not only not actually gone looking for one, but haven't even read op article, where the source is linked:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jan/07/chile.pinochet

And it isn't the only contemporary source, either:

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2001/08/chil-a30.html

As well as sources that confirms that Powell promoted deals with Saudi Arabia for a company that also paid £1m to Pinochet:

https://caat.org.uk/news/2005-09-27-2/

You can make as many excuses as you want to make yourselves feel better, but it will never magic these people in to being on our side as citizens.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thank you.

The guardian article is also the second result for "Jonathan Powell pinochet" on google.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Sure thing, the lengths some people will go to to defend their cognitive dissonance is ridiculous..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All the article states is that Powell had meetings with the chief of press for President Frei's government... the government that indicted and arrested Pinochet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The government that engineered his escape from standing trial for genocide, then indicted him for "kidnapping" only to dismiss the case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This article Guardian article, on top of just being an allegation in a book, doesn't accuse Powell of doing what Skwawkbox says he did.

Literally all it says is that the press chief of the 1999 Chilean government (i.e. 10 years and two governments after Pinochet stepped down) had meetings with Powell. That's it.

Frei and his government, by the way, was anti-Pinochet. During his presidency, he indicted and arrested Pinochet.

I don't know how you could read that and think it's a confirmation that Powell negotiated release for Pinochet.

Stop spreading misinformation.