this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)
PostgreSQL
655 readers
14 users here now
The world's most advanced open source relational database
Project
- About (history)
- Docs
- Donate to PostgreSQL
- Wiki
- Planet PostgreSQL
- IRC
- Mailing lists:
- pgsql-announce
- pgsql-hackers (developers)
- pgsql-general
- pgsql-jobs
- User Groups
Events
- SEAPUG Summer BBQ, 6 July in Seattle
- SFBA PostgreSQL Meetup, 12 July
- Chicago PostgreSQL Meetup, 19 July
- PGDay UK 2023, 12 September in London
- PGConf 2023, 3-5 October in New York City
- PGDay Israel 2023, 19 October
- PGConf.EU 2023, 12-15 December in Prague
Podcasts
Related Fediverse communities
- c/SQL on programming.dev
- #sql on Mastodon
- #postgresql on Mastodon
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have used jsonb in production and it is plenty fast for general purpose workloads. If you need high performance, you will want to stick with a normalized schema, but in general jsonb is pretty slick and highly performant when compared with things like mongo.
With that said, if you are developing queries against jsonb, you should really try not to use it. Dumping denormalized data into a single blob is going to make your life really painful in a few years when you have giant piles of highly differentiated data. Postgres will happily let you do it, and I don’t know your use case, but think carefully about the tech debt you may be incurring by using this over the long term