Arch Linux

7770 readers

12 users here now

The beloved lightweight distro

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Which is better: Aura or Paru? (self.archlinux)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by AsudoxDev to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been using paru. Just wanted to know if aura is, in your opinion, better than paru and why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Neither. Use yay, because it sounds happy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hehe

I'm using yay, because it was "the new thing", when I switched to Arch (and Arch-based systems)

But after that I've stopped comparing

Is there anything new, that is actually worth switching from yay?

[–] kogasa 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Paru was at one point a rewrite of yay in Rust, and has since continued development as a pseudo parallel fork. It's good. Dunno if it's worth switching, you'd have to see if there's any specific features you might happen to want, but they're both fine

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks! :⁠-⁠)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe there's builtin customizepkg or custom repo support in some helper?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I love typing 'yay kitty' on a new install

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

And now I must follow suit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

+1 for happy tool