Got this creepy bullshit in the mail today.
Glad I had voted for Harris/Walz
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Mildly Infuriating
35369 readers
161 users here now
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah I don't think that's a threat, poorly worded maybe. The Trump one was hinting at it (because plausible deniability is how they work).
The point is that both sides have lost there minds. Trying to pretend that the Democrats are somehow less worse is silly. Call them out for what it is. That's the only way you will see change.
Saying "your vote is private" isn't a threat.
"But the fact that you voted is pubic record" implies "we're paying attention and could hassle in some form those who abstain if we choose."
(Well, that'd be the argument for "threat" in the above text anyway. Imo threat or not it's poorly worded leading to it being creepy, but that's probably the extent of it. I doubt we'll see any side round up and execute abstainers or some crazy shit like that.)
Seriously?
What is implied depends on the tone in which it is said.
From the GOP that "whether or not you vote is public record" in a sudden red text, and "your family friends and coworkers will know", along with fucking binoculars carries a very sinister tone.
The Dems "Thank you!" and "Please vote" does not. The whether you vote is public record looks to me pretty matter of fact. Why it's even said is a bit out of place, which is what I said was poorly worded.
This is not "both sides same" like the other guy suggested.
Well, being read rather than said, I'd argue the tone is inferred by the reader.
And in any case, as a privacy focused individual, I'm not exactly crazy about either. I'm also not crazy about junk mail, so junk mail that implies it's watching me in any form, I double don't like. Y'all killing trees for this fucking bullshit?! No thanks.
You can't be serious. Yeah you aren't, so you pivot to trees.
I am serious, and don't call me Shirley. People can be creeped out by things that don't creep you out, you know.
And what, you like junk mail that is 100% just a waste of resources in a world where we're hurdling towards total climate annihilation? It could have just as easily been an email everyone ignored rather than a mailer everyone ignored.