Fuck AI

1449 readers

217 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

546

Parents Sue School That Gave Bad Grade to Student Who Used AI to Complete Assignment (gizmodo.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

194 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Massachusetts couple claims that their son's high school attempted to derail his future by giving him detention and a bad grade on an assignment he wrote using generative AI.

An old and powerful force has entered the fraught debate over generative AI in schools: litigious parents angry that their child may not be accepted into a prestigious university.

In what appears to be the first case of its kind, at least in Massachusetts, a couple has sued their local school district after it disciplined their son for using generative AI tools on a history project. Dale and Jennifer Harris allege that the Hingham High School student handbook did not explicitly prohibit the use of AI to complete assignments and that the punishment visited upon their son for using an AI tool—he received Saturday detention and a grade of 65 out of 100 on the assignment—has harmed his chances of getting into Stanford University and other elite schools.

Yeah, I'm 100% with the school on this one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because if you didn't write it, you have to cite it.

If a computer writes it and you say it's yours, your plagiarizing. You're not allowed to pay someone to write the essay for you, same goes for a computer.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do think the method should be mentioned. Kids should be taught to cite what they used ai for and which one amd there should be precise rules stating which use cases are ok and which are not tolerated (some SHOULD be tolerated). Detention is too much though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All of academia is breathing a sigh of relief that you're not a teacher.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

:) Ok. But why not to teach children how to work with new technology correctly? It's not as simple as AI bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because the point of the essay is to teach a topic, and hone research skills.

Typing a prompt in to a chat bot and copying the result is not an effective teaching tool. If you wanted to use it as a starting point it may occasionally be handy, but you need to know enough about what you're asking it to know when it's wrong. You need to take the results, and modify them to both sound human and correct mistakes. By that point you might as well just write the essay. And sure, there's something to be said for teaching that, but clearly that's not what this student was doing, nor are the multitude of my wife's students doing that when they use an LLM for their essays.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Exactly, that was my whole point - llms can be useful for making nice sentences out of data that you already know are right from your previous research and the whole result must be overviewed to make sure it makes sense. Using them like this can save you time or even help you out immensely if you happen to have no literary talent (believe me). It's not ok to use it for the research itself, the results are not good and the kid learns nothing. And that's why I think we need to teach kids how to use it appropriately. It's just like using a calculator. You need to learn to count first, but then it can save you time.