this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
133 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

47754 readers
762 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically the title

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You should go read Microsoft's attempt at excluding Linux/Unix from running on x86 using ACPI!

https://web.archive.org/web/20070202174648/http://www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

:O The Archive! It's back online!! WOOOOO

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Btw, in the end, they did this with their office format.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Browser too, and the whole activeX, and DirectX api system to practically force windows only development.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, same with gaming until Proton came along

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

for the millionth time they get to stand on the shoulders on all the wine development that came before it. and now we have to reckon with the bullshit of proton patches that never go upstream to make wine better for all

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Tbf if wine were released under regular GNU instead of LGPL, Valve wouldn't have been able to make Proton proprietary, and so their contributions would also be open source. It is unfortunate that this is the situation, but by using the LGPL license WINE basically permitted this, no?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

What about Proton is proprietary? The source is available on Github and may be used under the terms of the 3-clause BSD license.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Unix also including mac and bsds?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

@Mwa @wildbus8979 Yes, early on there was AT&T and Berkley, System-V became AT&T's mainstream though there were off-shoots like CB-Unix for PDP11/70's which only had 64k I+D space, and Berkeley had 4.2 and 4.3BSD, and now you have offshoots of those, such as FreeBSD and NETBSD, MacOS is a highly mutilated BSD sitting atop a Mach micro-kernel with the Mac finder sitting on top of the whole mess. The Mach microkernel provides a layer of hardware abstraction that makes it easy to jump between architectures as Mac has often done. What I do not like about MacOS is that they include only drivers necessary for their hardware and forbid the use on Non-Mac's by license. This limits your selection of things like video cards to those they specifically chose to use.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Ohh yeah locked down unix like the one used in game consoles like Playstation and Nintendo switch (these consoles are very very locked down no terminal or anything) and macos (less locked down) as well atleast macos you can install outside of the appstore which I HATED on ios and iPados

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

BSDs mostly, Mac wasn't a Unix based system at the time. It also didn't run on x86.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

@wildbus8979 @Mwa MacOS was Unix based after Steve Jobs created the Mach/Unix/Mac Finder stack for use on the Next computer, as soon as he returned to Apple, it was adopted there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I know. At the time of the ACPI debacle, Mac OS X didn't exist yet, and NeXT was essentially irrelevant because a) it didn't run x86 and b) it only ran on proprietary hardware.