this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

Political Memes

5348 readers
183 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

So vote for them regardless and then they will listen?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is an incorrect framing of the situation. You aren't being asked for a Yes/No vote on Democrats. You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans. Or for this election, if you prefer Democracy or Fascism. If you vote "no preference", that does not communicate "I prefer the Democrats, but want them to move further left", either logically or politically.

There are lots of ways to communicate desired policy changes: letter-writing, primaries (including campaigning/funding for candidates), protests, marches, press, social-media, etc. Voting against your interest is not one of them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans.

I understand why you'd say this. But you arent trying to understand why people are trying to pressure the dem leadership to be better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

I absolutely understand the anger at the Democratic party. I mention several useful activities to work toward fixing its many failings. The Republican party is strictly worse. Giving equal support to both is counterproductive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything. They've had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years. Or 6 of the last 32 years. Or 6 of the last 44 fucking years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything.

Thats not how politics works buddy. If what you said were true neither the dems or republicans would have passed any bills in the history of the "republic". Clearly theres also horse trading, and bribery/lobbying you are pretending dont exist in order to make this weak point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They've had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years

It was significantly shorter than that when you consider Senate control to be 60, which is what's needed to bypass the fillibuster.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They honored the fillibuster by choice. They didnt have to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

They never had 51 votes to repeal the fillibuster. Sinema and Manchin both refused to do so. Neither of which are Democrats anymore. We should elect more Democrats to the Senate that will.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Supermajority was 4 months, out of the last 44 years. But whenever I mention that people think I'm fixated on that for some reason

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You shouldn’t cry about fake internet points

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not crying, I'm laughing how certain people downvote because they don't like hearing facts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Somehow the terminally online tankies will still blame Democrats for that, too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The more elections the far right loses, the more the overton window shifts to the left.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

I dont think thats true all the time. as we have seen with Biden, If a dem president is a centrist or far right for a dem, it shifts the entire party and the judiciary rightward. These things have monentum.

So I'd say its not simply the "D" that matters in overton shift. It also sets the topics in the political conversation, and either strengthens the party for the next election or leaves it in shattered and misaligned, like we are now about the unpopular far right wing genocide being pushed by a democratic US presidential administration.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Democrats move further right to get votes from the center but when they win it'll go left trust me bro

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

This, but unironically.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

They go to the center when they lose. If they don't lose, they don't need to go to the center to find voters. You can see my other comment, they've only had all 3 houses for 4 out of the last 24 years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

you totally ignore that the Dems could simply represent the will of their constituents and not lose, and not need to "look for votes" outside the boundaries of their party. Kamala would be coasting to vicotry if she wasnt supporting Bidens dirty far right war. She is trying hard to not represent the Dems and take a far right stand on this, and thats the root of this problem. Not Progressive voters or the youth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's the left's fault for not feeling motivated to vote for a center-right party, they'll become even more right if we don't vote for them. Progressive candidates are dumb and unpopular.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So stay home/throw away your vote, I'm sure they'll realize their mistake and go to the left any decade now to chase those reliable voters.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And you throw away yours as well. We all lose. Finally a 'together' outcome where we are all on the same side and not just taking centrist far-right marching orders like slaves.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

they don't have to, let the whole thing collapse. Fascism never lasts long

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm sure the people who suffer and die under the fascist regime will be comforted by the fact it probably won't last long.

Too bad you'll find Nazis right along with you cheering on the rise of fascism, so I think your opinion can be safely discarded.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Yeah it's too bad the average person isn't doing anything about it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I honestly don't know what point you're trying to get at. In any case, if the left wants to be effective, they have to vote for Dems. Because, again, when they lose they go to the center to find voters.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Coalitions dont work if the larger group demands unconditional loyalty or ignores their coalition partners non negotiables. Dems are a coalition of various groups that cant win alone.

actively enabling Genocide is a non negotiable for progressives. And progressives are the difference between dems winning and dems losing.

Centrist dems have been trying to hold the entire party hostage to trumps evil so they can take AIPACS dirty bribes. So now progressives will play the exact same hostage games. We'll all go over the cliff into the bloody abyss together, or a few simple policy changes can be made. So get those changes done and lets win this election together. Or dont and our country is over. You choose. We already made our choice, and it was really no choice to be made at all. We were never going to enable genocide, its not who we are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Boy on to your 5th message to me. All this tells me is that you're very upset.

Again, this is about being effective. If you want to be effective, if you want to move the overton window, that is done by giving Dems consistent and overwhelming victories.

Again, Dems go to the center when they lose.

Anyone else can see my comment https://lemmy.world/comment/12867004.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

seems like if the left wants to be effective at this point it has to go far beyond voting

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, its not over yet. The left needs to police the far right wing elements within the dem party, and thats what its doing. gun proliferation does not belong on a dem platform and neither does enabling genocide. Thats the real problem here.

And asserting ourselves through voting hasnt 'not worked' yet. We'll see.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

The death grip the Evangelically, ethno-state, GOP has created for it's self, proves that voting locally for change, and voting in the "lesser" evil, in the presidential election, works. This was their strategy, only the GOP for the presidency, then, on the local levels, they spent most of their time getting people to vote them into smaller positions of power, especially judicial ones. Over the past 40 years they have entrenched themselves into so many voting districts, so many courts, so many sheriff's offices, etc., that, even being the minority, they exercise power much greater than their numbers. During this time, they kept moving those local offerings further, and further right. So now we are seeing a significant amount of governors, and senators, that are full blown fascist/theocratic.

If we lock in the Dems federally, and vote progressives locally, we can accomplish the same. Especially if we focus on local voting reforms that are different styles of voting, that allow for more breathing room of third parties. The proof is that the far right theocrats did just this with the GOP.