this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1121 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

5377 readers
662 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
1121
The value of x (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Following your logic, there is no evidence that these are triangles and it is never stated, therefore none of these lines might be straight and the discussion is irrelevant.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

There is also no evidence that these are lines at all and not just unconnected points that are offset on a subpixel scale. Or indeed there is no evidence that they are using base 10 numbers or aren't asking a completely different question in an invented language that just happens to look like English but has totally different semantics.

The people claiming it is unsolvable because one 110/80 degree pair of angles looks like a 90/90 one are ridiculous.