this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
191 points (96.1% liked)

Canada

7307 readers
875 users here now

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
191
“F*cking absurd”: $82 turkey at Loblaw-owned store has shoppers stunned (dailyhive.com)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Looks like Roblaw’s at it again… robbing the working class to keep obscene profits rolling to the Parasite Class. And I bet the farmer who raised those turkeys get only a few dollars per.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So you would rather they slaughter an excessive amount of animals that will then be entirely discarded, then to actually go to people to eat?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, I would prefer to see markets selling those at a loss so they don't make a profit and food isn't wasted. ~And hopefully that loss motivates them to plan for less consumption next year and/or reducing the amount they're willing to pay producers, decreasing the profitability of the meat production industry.~

But as I said before, there's no evidence yet that the food waste is increasing due to price increases. This is just speculation from people who wouldn't buy the thing because they fail to imagine that there are people who would.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes. I would rather the animals' deaths be entirely pointless and bring zero revenue to the animal killers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Killing animals is wrong! Unless you're pointlessly killing them so someone doesn't profit from it!"

Dude are you alright, cause wow, what a fucked up and incredibly disgusting view.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

No, killing is still wrong when it's pointless. You need to pay attention and take this discussion seriously. Killing that doesn't benefit murderers is better than killing that benefits murderers, because murder shouldn't be profitable.