Asklemmy

43606 readers

1141 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why are we training AIs on reddit posts instead of Research Papers? We could be saving the world! (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If AI is only a "parrot" as you say, then why should there be worries about extinction from AI?

You should look closer who is making those claims that "AI" is an extinction threat to humanity. It isn't researchers that look into ethics and safety (not to be confused with "AI safety" as part of "Alignment"). It is the people building the models and investors. Why are they building and investing in things that would kill us?

AI doomers try to 1. Make "AI"/LLMs appear way more powerful than they actually are. 2. Distract from actual threats and issues with LLMs/"AI". Because they are societal, ethical, about copyright and how it is not a trustworthy system at all. Cause admitting to those makes it a really hard sell.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

We cripple things by not programming the the abilities we obviously could give them.

We could have AI do an integrity check before printing an answer. No problem at all. We don't.

We could do many things to unbound the limitations AI has.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you look at the signatories (in the link) there are plenty of people who are not builders and investors, people who are in fact scientists in the field.