this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
374 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
277 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lessons for whom? I have several things I would like to kill but lack the requisite trillions to execute my vision.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sounds like a Kickstarter idea if I've ever seen one.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Tired of running your massively popular online service? Call BrandWreckers(TM) , your one-stop shop for dismantling user loyalty and brand reputation. Call now and lose your first 10k users for free!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

“All you have to do is point!”

[–] MagicShel 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You know I wonder if we could create a non profit that exists only to buy things and then donate them (IP, closed source, whatever) to the public domain. If you had a savvy board, such an organization could do a lot of good.

Something like this must already exist, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A savvy board would get a 10% cut on each transaction, count me in!

[–] MagicShel 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean they would need to be paid, but idk about a percentage. Mostly just to fairly compensate them for the time spent vetting deals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What's savvy about getting paid just for your time? You need to get paid for expertise, opportunities, networking... that's at least 10%, since a non-profit wouldn't have preference shares.

[–] MagicShel 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm leery about a percentage just because I perceive a conflict of interest. Overall compensation of 10% might be about right, but tying actual compensation to the cost of stuff that is bought creates a perverse incentive to overspend on things. That's money donated for the betterment of humanity, not so I can have a 3 acre swimming pool.

But IDK maybe I'm looking at it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you are looking at it kind of wrong, in that: with a savvy board, the first savvy thing they would do, would be to guarantee their own self-benefit, going head first into a conflict of interest... meaning you can't have a project like that driven by a savvy board, instead you need an altruistic, idealistic, etc. board... but then, a non-savvy board, would be much likely to just squander the money, or get swindled out of it, so... I don't think a project like that would ever work as expected.

[–] MagicShel 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough. It's a two-edged sword.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Would be the largest one if we want to go after facebook