this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
549 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
9 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
549
NIST proposes barring some of the most nonsensical password rules (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Here is the text of the NIST sp800-63b Digital Identity Guidelines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One thing they should change is the word "password." This implies that it's a short string. Changing it to "passphrase" will help people feel comfortable choosing credentials like "correct horse battery staple."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I recently set up a password with a 16 character max, alphanumeric only, no spaces. The service is in no way a security threat but still.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A couple years ago I ran into one with a 12 character limit...

I never understood password limits, other than something sufficiently large like 256 to prevent DOS. It's not like the password is actually being stored anywhere... right? RIGHT??