Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers

268 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Telegram Removes Z-Library Posts 'Due to Copyright Infringement' * TorrentFreak (torrentfreak.com)

submitted 2 months ago by onlinepersona to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Telegram, an essential communication tool for millions, finds itself under scrutiny once again. Copyright holders have long expressed concerns about the lack of enforcement on the platform, and recent actions suggest Telegram is responding. Subscribers to Z-Library's popular channel recently noticed that several of the shadow library's messages have been removed "due to copyright infringement."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (3 children)

you're on a piracy community but you're licensing your comments?

if you don't respect other's licences, why should they respect yours?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Not gonna lie... That little link is funny to me.

[–] onlinepersona 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

On the face of it, I appreciate that it looks funny, but the power dynamics are quite different. If I'm caught pirating, my ass could land in jail. If a company is caught pirating, it's written off a business expense.

Would you find it as ridiculous if a slave whipped their owner? If the poor stole from the rich? If the weak took power from the powerful?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

None of those examples have any relation to the ignorance of these licensing links.

[–] onlinepersona 1 points 2 months ago

What "ignorance"? The licensing link is added manually. I've read it.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Also what's the point of being anti-ai when you're already anti-cpyright?

The issue isn't generative AI, its capitalism. The AI just makes capitalism's bad parts more efficient, or is at least supposed to.

[–] onlinepersona 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't believe you want a genuine answer. You've already made a decision, so no matter what I say, you won't agree with it 🤷 There's no need to continue.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Almost as if context matters, huh? 🤷

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Well that's an assumption...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They don’t make money out of copyright and are a person not corporation.

In my private ethical code this is valid.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

What's wrong with trying to prevent companies scrape your data? How is that antithetical to piracy?