this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
45 points (97.9% liked)

Satisfactory

1364 readers
1 users here now

The unofficial Lemmy community for Satisfactory, the factory-building and exploration game.

Useful Links:

Looking for Group?

@[email protected] started a dedicated server and welcomes Fediverse users, find out more by DMing them or joining this steam chat

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content
  4. No ads/spamming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
45
What methodology do you prefer? Monolith factory or microfactories (self.satisfactory)
submitted 2 months ago by notnotmike to c/[email protected]
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

My friend and I routinely have conversations about factory design.

His ideal factory ships every ore in its raw state to a single building, which can then move the ore to different floors/sections for processing. He goes further than most and separates each product into its own "room", so all steel bars are made in one room then shipped to the steel beam and steel pipe rooms. Importantly the factory should be designed so that you can "infinitely" expand a room if you need more of that resource.

I prefer what I call "microfactories", where each component is created in a small, independent factory and the result is shipped to a main repository for builder use and for the space elevator construction. If you need modular frames, for example, you would find a group of ores and build a small factory on it and build every sub-component you can in it. Ideally, it would not rely on any other microfactory's outputs, but sometimes that's easier said than done. Often I will have a small cluster of microfactories all dedicated to shipping their output to a final microfactory for processing.

So what do you all use?

Note: He claims his design is more analogous to microservices (from software architecture) than mine, and that mine is something apparently called "pirate architecture". I think he's out of his mind on that one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So I'll throw in that there's a performance hit for huge factories. The game chunks the world state, it's why your frame rate goes up when you walk to a new area. A huge mega factory in one area will limit you in that area, and it will start to feel sluggish later on. Separating your factories across multiple areas helps because it will spread the load across the CPUs cores, and it will feel faster. Your gpu will also be happier to not need to render everything

[–] notnotmike 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think if I make that argument he's going to just reference the fact that we both have very powerful computers. Although he's never experienced auto-save hell yet, so maybe when that starts happening he'll see the light

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah we made that argument too, and we upgraded the server to the top of the line AMD and it still chugged. It's an incremental thing, it doesn't change the fact that you're still in one chunk, so you're entire factory is still just on one core. Spreading out means you'll spread the load out too. What's the point of all of those cores if most will sit idle?

Plus when you hit 500 hours in a factory the entire world becomes a mega factory anyway. Eventually what you thought was a mega factory just is one of many of those factories. Oil processing alone for me can span the entirety of the Gold Coast if i really want to maximize it.