C++

1773 readers

1 users here now

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

Respect instance rules.
Don't be a jerk.
Please keep all posts related to C++.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lysdexic

[email protected]

Nihili0

The empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprint (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by cmeerw to c/cpp

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If a "safe C++" proposal truly proposes a safe subset, then yes your C++ code would have to opt-in to doing unsafe things. For the purposes of this discussion of a safe subset ... the point is moot.

[–] FizzyOrange 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not moot. The Safe C++ is opt-in to safety. It has to be because otherwise it wouldn't be compatible with existing C++.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's a laudable difference /s. Using Rust is also an "opt-in" option.