this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
66 points (88.4% liked)

Fediverse

27740 readers
268 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The fediverse is now something that you can evangelize about. Its turning into a buzzword ...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I thought Threads was for people who thought Mastodon was too complicated. What's all this "turn on sharing" mess?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago

Something most accounts will never touch.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The official story is that Meta is worried about being sued by people suddenly seeing their content pushed to some random website without their consent if it's enabled by default, so they won't risk enabling it by default. At least not before the fediverse is huge enough that everything you post going everywhere on the internet is the expected behaviour.

Fair enough really. I wouldn't want to be sued for that either, and they obviously cannot expect Congress to understand.. anything.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hate it but it is a fair position.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

It is a fair position in the sense that it's technically within their legal rights to do whatever the fuck they want, but it is a feeble sham compared to the full and well-behaved fedi interoperability they should've had from the start since that was how it was sold from to their users from the beginning.

If they some day get there, I would still be open to considering federating with it. For now "it’s an ongoing process" as they carefully tweak things to find out how far they can go with the strictly limited access to the outside world they allow, while still keeping all their users captive.

If you were a threads user, you'd be unable to reply to this even if you did somehow see it. I welcome any of them to do so and prove me wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have Facebook not heard of the Internet? Anyone can right click save as.

I am very skeptical that Facebook is doing federated to be nice, only to keep digital markets act off Facebooks back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have Facebook not heard of the Internet? Anyone can right click save as.

They have, old politicians haven't

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That's why Facebook were able to buy Instagram and WhatsApp without issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Threads is for whoever Meta can sell it to, and I think it was pretty far along in its development before they actually committed to ActivityPub support.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bruh we knew they were federating before we even knew the name of the platform. Pretty sure it was always intended that way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

The fact that it's been out for a year and federation is still only half-implemented suggests to me the decision to add it was pretty late in the development process, even if it was early in the marketing process.