this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
858 points (98.6% liked)
People Twitter
5277 readers
441 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm uncomfortable with contemplating the idea of oyster flesh.
?
I mean, you should be, because they're salty gross loogies full of filtered poison, but it's the whole fucking thing.
I don't know how to answer this because I feel like the question mark is immediately addressed, heh.
I guess I was confused because "oyster flesh" is just the whole thing? You don't really have partial cuts of oyster, so you'd have to find the idea of oysters themselves disgusting.
I despise oysters as food but the idea of them existing doesn't bother me. They're just a bundle of muscle and organs in a shell, the gross part is eating them.
I mean, that's a fair assessment. Honestly, the main reasons it bothered me were:
If you're not familiar with the second, I'd recommend not googling it as you'll likely find some gruesome images. The page I linked does have one somewhat cartoonish depiction of the syndrome, fair warning, but no actual photos.
edit: Converted paragraphs to list format to avoid line break shenanigans.
The reason you have an aversion to eating whole animals is because you can't distance yourself from the act of choosing to have that animal killed for a delicacy.
When you get a package of meat, most of negative mental impacts of the decision are taken out on slaughterhouse workers, who have tremendously higher rates of depression and anxiety. Put simpler, they have to find ways to deal with the negative emotions that come from the type of work they do.
Thats sort of how paying for stuff always has been, just the distance is father and we've figured out how to take the bad feelings and put them on marginalized groups who aren't us. Bad feelings affect profit.
So if you had to go and point out which animal you want your cut of meat from, you'd likely have the same negative reaction to watching it be butchered as you would putting a whole dead animal in your mouth.
Perhaps you're right.
I think the reason is eating parts I don't normally eat. For example, I don't usually eat eyes or bones. (I recognize that this conversation is about oysters, which don't have bones (or maybe eyes, I'm not sure) in the way most animals I eat do, but my aversion extends beyond oysters.) Therefore, consumption of unusual (to me) body parts is upsetting, especially considering the lack of hygiene in many kitchens. For example, while I don't, my wife enjoys shrimp and has pointed out the lack of poop removal in several restaurants. Sounds pretty gross to me.
I've never eaten lobster, so I've never had to point at a living creature and say "feed me that"; I've never gone the H2G2 route and selected a section of meat from a living animal; I have occasionally looked at a cut of meat and thought it used to be part of something living and felt brief revulsion, but it hasn't yet stopped me from enjoying a meal. (That sounds like a sarcastic comment but wasn't meant to be.)
I don't eat crab because I'm allergic, but the idea doesn't disgust me (Marylandian that I am), so I don't think it's metaphorical or literal distance from the creature that causes me to object.
I recognize the moral position of vegans and others who object to the consumption of meat. I don't even necessarily disagree with them, other than that I don't think there's an objective morality in the universe. I just don't like eating things that my upbringing did not teach me to think of as edible.
Two more basically irrelevant things that amuse me to mention:
I agree with the creepy parts, I felt that way too when I ate animals although I didnt know all the icky stuff you posted like with shrimp!
Its interesting you mention having fleeting negative feelings from a cut of beef but crabs are not given any consideration when boiled alive or stabbed through the skull and then boiled.
I'm not trying to pin you down to a contradiction either, Im aware its common to sort of treat different groups if animals differently but it always is interesting to me the justification.
So why no moral consideration for crabs compared to cows, even if its only a little bit?
Edit: the video you posted reminds me of a story of a Chinese place that would allow you to bring a cat or dog and they would cook it for you. Yikes!
In my previous post, I said I was allergic to crabs. I don't actually know if that's true, because I've never eaten one; the claim is based on the fact that all three of my siblings are - violently so - so I never felt the need to test it. Perhaps that's why I've never explored the moral implications.
That said, many times I've seen the claim that most animals that become seafood don't have nervous systems supporting feeling pain the way that we do. If my food didn't suffer, that would be a comfort to me; however, I'm not sure I believe that claim (and especially not the moral excuse it tries to provide).
I have been with friends who fish in catch-and-release environments. The only time I participated in one, I was a child and didn't really know what it entailed beforehand (and, to my relief, didn't catch anything). If fish truly aren't sentient and can't feel pain, then there's no reason to object; but the idea of being spiked through the cheek, pulled from my atmosphere, suffocating for a while and then being returned - with no comprehension of what happened - is pretty horrifying.
I know it was a long post, but I was just pontificating because I don't have an objectively defensible answer to your question, other than perhaps if I ate crabs ever I'd feel more qualms. Truth be told, I don't often feel those qualms about beef or chicken or other land bound meat, I just have more opportunity to.
That Chinese place sounds very upsetting, if real. Hopefully you still enjoyed the linked video.
Also, I see your instance is separate from mine, but given the recent drama over veganism on my instance perhaps we should exercise caution in our conversation!
I think its fair that if you know you can't ever do something, why consider the moral implications of it? Something else would have to happen to trigger the thoughts about it.
I think the science on the fish thing is catching up. I believe its argued now that they do feel pain, although I usually just go by whether it wants to be alive or not. If I could kill you painlessly in your sleep, is that moral?
I actually left your instance because of that. Theres a handful of instances that pretty much all show the same content anyways, and I figured I'd better get off of there before I get banned.
So far though the discussion seems to be allowed to stand, go look at the comment chains in their two announcements, and it was full of rehashing the argument that caused all the trouble. There was some really funny memes too.
I still don't understand how vegan cat food is more taboo than, well literally everything it seems, based on other discussions ive seen on world.