this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)
Formula 1
9013 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 United States | 18-20 Oct |
| 🇲🇽 Mexico | 25-27 Oct |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | 01-03 Nov |
| 🇺🇸 United States | 21-23 Nov |
| 🇶🇦 Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| 🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If another team finds out RB is using it then asks the FIA if they are legal the FIA could have no knowledge that RB had fitted one.
Likely they would have suggested RB have it fitted at the same time, why miss an opportunity to fuck them up?
It wouldn't fuck them up though, using it before it was outlawed is perfectly legal. This kind of thing has happened before where team A notices team B is using something funky. Team A asks the FIA to clarify the rules so they can be certain it's legal before copying. The FIA then says it's illegal and neither team gets to use it from that point on.
Well it would if it costs them performance and it had to be took off in a hurry, as it takes time to do a work around that doesn't cost performance if it's even possible without major work. Any rapid change like that is hard to deal with.